The County should deny the Idaho-Maryland Mine and should not certify the Final EIR
Library
Browse through or search our library of expert and community articles, presentations, and opinion pieces.
The views and opinions expressed here are those of the original creators and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CEA Foundation or the MineWatch campaign.
David Briceno: Negative aspects of proposed mine considered
Peter Burnes: Enough gold for 600 years
John Vaughan, The mine: It’s not about economics, it’s about risk
Jim Steinmann: Mine jobs – Harsh, few, and not for locals
Ray Bryars: Economic Impact Report
Jeff Kane: Mine's economic report shows County's lack of due diligence
Press Release: Community Weighs in on Mine’s Economic Report
Questionable Economic Return - Dec 2022 MineWatch meeting
Learn About the County's Economic Impact Report
Press Release: CEA Foundation Urges Caution Interpreting Mine’s Economic Impact Report
CEA Foundation Questions: Economic Impact Report
Paul Schwartz: Mine’s unintended consequences not mentioned
Terry Lamphier: Mine our green, not our gold
Terry McLaughlin: Still not convinced mine should reopen
★ 312 Jobs? Not What It Seems. Look Closer.
★ A close look at Rise Gold's Job Claims
Rise Gold Investors Beware: Idaho-Maryland Mine Unlikely Before 2034
★ Martin Webb: Analyzing the Idaho-Maryland Fudge Factory
Energy ROI: We Can Do Better - Martin Webb
★ Bob Clark: Property Values At Risk
Request for Economic Study of Mine Impacts